Skip to main content

Who is at fault?

Everyone, and I do mean everyone, makes bad choices. It's just the way life goes. Some of us make worse choices than others, again that's just the way life goes.... IF WE LET IT.
I'm really annoyed at this entire "it's not my fault, I'm completely free of blame" attitude displayed by so many people now a days. So, let me take a moment to clear a few of these "who's to blame" questions up:
You're sitting in your house when a tornado comes through- not your fault.
You're watching TV, see the news report that a tornado is headed you way, and you go outside to watch it. You get hit with a branch and die- you're fault.

You're walking down the street when suddenly a power line breaks and you get electrocuted- not you're fault.
You're walking down the street, see a power line down that happens to be in a pool of water, and you run over to play jump rope with it, and die- you're fault.

You're online and someone breaks into your house killing you- again not you're fault.
You're online and you invite someone over that you don't know but has multiple comments about wanting to kill people on their site. They get to your house and kill you- you're fault.

Do you see where I am going with this? You make BAD CHOICES, and you have to suffer the cost of that. Don't like it? Stop being stupid. It's that easy.

I know, you're wondering why I feel the need to address this. Well, here it is:
Yahoo News: Tanya Nicole Kach, 24, came forward March 21 and told police that she had been living in Thomas Hose's house for 10 years. Kach told police that Hose, 48, kept her in a bedroom in the small, two-story home where he lived with his parents.


Bad situation. Tragic really. But, the story doesn't end there. It turns out Kach has decided to sue people involved in the case, because she feels that they didn't do enough to find her.

Pretty crappy of me to try to say she's wrong, that she should be taking responsibility for the fact that she was held captive, huh? Well, you might think that... until you see this gem:

SOURCE "Ms. Kach had told her in recent days that when she was in the eighth grade her parents were going through a contentious divorce and that she was convinced neither parent wanted her, leading her to run away.

At the time, Ms. Kach said, she had a crush on Mr. Hose, and when she confided her plans to leave home, he offered to take her in"


I know, we don't blame victims. It's not PC. But, lets look at this.

She pursued an older man. Bad Idea.
She told him she was running away. Bad Idea.
She ran away. Bad Idea.
She went to him. Bad Idea.

And now, who does she decide to blame? Not herself for being a stupid 14 year old girl who willingly ran away. Not even her capture really. No, she's blaming those who tried to find her. Who worked the case, spent hours going over possible leads. She's going to sue, because at 14 she made a bad choice, and they weren't able to find her.

People, I try to be understanding. I try to give the benefit of the doubt to everyone. But, this one is really hard for me to grasp. I can see her suing the man, his family- because according to reports 3 other people lived in that house with them, but to sue the city?

Did the city instruct her to be a spoiled little brat who put her own stupid little plans of running away into action? Was it the city or the school that caused her parents unimaginable grief when she left?

Yes, what happened to her was bad. But at some point, she has to be willing to step up and say that her actions played a role in this, rather than blaming the city for not rescuing her.

Smoking causes cancer. If you light up, and you end up with cancer... it's your fault.
Drunk driving causes deaths, if you get completely wasted, and hop in your car, crash into a tree and die... it's your fault.

Had she not been a selfish little girl acting out, chances are she wouldn't have ended up with the life she did. It is fair? NO. Was this perv wrong in doing this to her? YES. But she has to accept her own personal role in this.
Categories:

Popular posts from this blog

Sen. Kennedy

empirical- ADJECTIVE: Relying on or derived from observation or experiment: empirical results that supported the hypothesis. Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment: empirical laws. Guided by practical experience and not theory, especially in medicine Kennedy hate crimes rider may doom Hatch's sex offender bill By Robert Gehrke The Salt Lake Tribune WASHINGTON - A fight over federal hate crimes legislation could torpedo Sen. Orrin Hatch's push to strengthen the nation's sex-offender registries and clamp down on sex crimes. The Senate Judiciary Committee gave quick, unanimous approval to Hatch's bill Thursday, clearing its way for consideration by the full Senate. But Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said he plans to try to attach language to a bill that would require tougher sentences, provide federal assistance and offer grants to prosecute hate crimes - those motivated by hatred for a race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. The White ...

WTW Someone Please Help Us

There's so much to work with, I'm going to just hit as much as I can. Ashely Simpson decided to pick a fight at McDonald's. Betting millions that if the employee would just go and get the manager- the manager would just love her. Simpson's climbing on the counter and irate behavior where in typical White Trash Style. Great coverage at Stereogum. Tom Cruise has decidedly canned his sister for her inability to help him keep his mouth shut. Evidently he needs a real professional as his PR person- in order to keep him in line. It's just not right firing family because you're and idiot. Kate Hudson is suing someone because of photos of her in which she looks like a starving actress. She claims the images suggest she has a eating disorder- no Kate, it's not the images, it's the you. One should not sue because they have starved themselves to the point of it being noticeable in photos. Please stop by these other great sites to read more WHITE TRASH WEDNESDAY B...

Boyfriends...

I sometimes wonder if certain men have some sort of animal DNA breed into them. The type of DNA or whatever it is that makes animals ritually preform certain actions. Like lions, when a male lion takes over a pride it'll often kill the offspring of the previous male, before mating with the female lions and creating cubs of it's own. I only wonder this, because it seems like there are an overwhelming number of men out there that end up killing the children of their girlfriends, not all of them do- but on a case by case comparison between girlfriends killing their boyfriends offspring and boyfriends doing it, it just seems that it's a lot more common amoung men. NOT THAT ALL OF THEM DO THIS... there are some great boyfriends/stepfathers out there that actually take care of kids as if they are their own... but then we have cases like Christopher Thunborg and Kashon Scott. Thunborg was babysitting his girlfriend's 11 month of baby in March when police say he caused ...