Someone explain to me why it is that we even have an insanity plea. I mean honestly, if they are that "crazy" that they feel cutting the arms of their children is something God wants them to do- we ought to just kill them. You surely can't fix that. So, put them out of their misery.
I'm so tired of hearing how she had a cut on her own arm- like that is suppose to make the fact that she cut off this babies arms with a kitchen knife any more acceptable.
Ten against two. Actually ten against one- the other couldn't seem to make up their mind. To know that only ONE person was willing to demand that this woman be held responsible for her actions is mind boggling to say the least. What the hell has happened to the justice system when 10 people can be convinced that this woman should be found not guilty by reason of insanity?
Mistrial in Case of Girl's Severed Arms
Categories: abused, murders
I'm so tired of hearing how she had a cut on her own arm- like that is suppose to make the fact that she cut off this babies arms with a kitchen knife any more acceptable.
A judge declared a mistrial Saturday in the murder trial of a woman accused of fatally cutting the arms off her 10-month-old daughter.
Jurors deadlocked during the fourth day of deliberations in the case of Dena Schlosser, 37, who pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.
"There was heated discussion, and tempers flared in the jury room," said juror Chris Penn as he left court. "It was a long ordeal, very tiring."
Ten against two. Actually ten against one- the other couldn't seem to make up their mind. To know that only ONE person was willing to demand that this woman be held responsible for her actions is mind boggling to say the least. What the hell has happened to the justice system when 10 people can be convinced that this woman should be found not guilty by reason of insanity?
Mistrial in Case of Girl's Severed Arms
Categories: abused, murders
Comments
However, just like a very young child will grow up to understand, this woman with treatment and medication can be brought to a state where she can understand and where she won't be a danger. Likely when that happens, she will be in a lot of pain.
I know I am in the minority, but just wanted to state my opinion.
btw where is the father during all this. I havent read anything about him.Maybe i missed it.
I think that insanity should not be a plea in the court system it's either guilty or noguilty.You did it or you didn't,no matter the motive. If found guilty then the facility where they would spend their jail time should evaluate the individuals mental condition. If they are found to have a mental condition, put them in a mental facility until they are "better" and then send their butts back to JAIL! But thats my opinion!
Oh, if only it could be that simple! I do agree that people cop out too easily and don't accept responsibility for their actions. When sane people lie and use the insanity defense to get out of paying for a crime it makes it tougher on those who are insane. And a lot depends on the quality of your legal representation. Here is a quote I have unfortunately found to be true:
"They're putting on witnesses who they know are lying. They concealed exonerating evidence. Don't we have enough criminal conduct by the prosecutors to put them behind bars?"
"It doesn't work that way," the lawyer laughed. "The law is just for the little people. When we break the rules we go to jail. When they break the rules they go to lunch...."
"But what about the law?" the woman gasped. "What about the Constitution?"
"I'm afraid that's just one of those nice, comforting fantasies like the tooth fairy. There are two classes of people. Those who hold power and those who do not. And in any dispute the guys who hold power will decide which way it's going to go....I hope you understand that this is not about child abuse, just as McCarthyism was not about Communists."
--- Eberle, Paul and Shirley. The Abuse of Innocence: The McMartin Preschool Trial (1993) (reporting a discussion between a friend of the Buckeys and a defense lawyer)