Skip to main content

Well, he's sorry now

It's never good when I pull up a story and the first sentence my eyes land on reads:
Walleman told Chrzanowski that he is sorry and realizes he needs rehabilitation, but the judge responded that Walleman failed in his second chance.

Turns out a Macomb Michigan child molester has been getting more than his share of second chances. Let's see if you can follow this, cause the judge seems to be having problems with it:
Ronald Elliott Walleman, 53, was sentenced Monday by Macomb Circuit Judge Mary Chrzanowski, who scolded Walleman for assaulting a 10-year-old girl after the judge had already sentenced him to one year in jail and five years probation for assaulting a 5-year-old in 2001.

"You slapped the court in the face when you went out and committed this new crime," Chrzanowski told Walleman moments before ordering him to spend 78 months in prison, less one year of time-served.

Walleman was convicted of attempted first-degree criminal sexual conduct and sentenced by Chrzanowski in 2003 for assaulting a St. Clair Shores girl. Originally charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct, he reached a plea bargain after two additional victims came forward and agreed to testify about his alleged assaults against them. He then pleaded guilty to the attempted charge.

After being released from the Macomb County Jail nearly two years ago and still on probation, he sexually assaulted a 10-year-old girl in a public place in Monroe County and pleaded guilty last year to second-degree criminal sexual conduct. He was sentenced to at least 38 months in prison.

Because of the probation violation, Chrzanowski could sentence him to two-thirds of 10 years, the maximum penalty of the offense, although sentencing guidelines indicated a minimum sentence ranging from only 5 months to 23 months.


Besides the five year old, the ten year old, and the girl in St. Clair- more victims have come forward to testify, one his niece and one his cousin, another girl accused him of molesting her when he was a teenager, although no charges were brought. Yet Walleman's defense says it is unfair to call him a "serial pedophile" because of only two convictions. A case of "it only counts if I have to serve time" denial, I'm supposing.

This sick freak could be facing life in prison... but something tells me the wuss judge will be more likely to assist in helping give him "treatment" and then play the catch and release game. After all, it seems like they've been taking that route with him for years.

Categories: ,




Macomb Daily : Molester assaults girl while serving probation 04/18/06
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
First, this sicko predator needed to be put away forever....for the first time he was CAUGHT. But the rest of the story....is a crime in my eyes as well of just allowing him to be free. These damn soft judges..that think they are some type of God...need to go to jail with them. I am so sick of these judges allowing these sex predators/offenders/pedos whatever you want to call them on the street. There is no cure....and I am beginning to believe that these soft/liberal judges could very well be guilty of similar crimes...if not porn junkies themselves or worse. This makes me sick.
22/4/06
Anonymous said…
You can help in making sentencing more standarized by participating in an ongoing forensic research that asks the general public to help shape criminal sentencing standards. At www.depravityscale.org the public can have a direct voice in the development of community based standards to aid juries to replace arbitariness with evidence-based objective fairness. The survey asks you to rank intents, actions and attitudes of crimes against each other, to identify what society feels constitues "the worst of the worst: thus warranting more severe punishment.
Participation takes appoximately 10 minutes. To participate please log on to www.depravityscale.org

If you have any questions Email questions@depravityscale.org
16/5/06
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sen. Kennedy

empirical- ADJECTIVE: Relying on or derived from observation or experiment: empirical results that supported the hypothesis. Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment: empirical laws. Guided by practical experience and not theory, especially in medicine Kennedy hate crimes rider may doom Hatch's sex offender bill By Robert Gehrke The Salt Lake Tribune WASHINGTON - A fight over federal hate crimes legislation could torpedo Sen. Orrin Hatch's push to strengthen the nation's sex-offender registries and clamp down on sex crimes. The Senate Judiciary Committee gave quick, unanimous approval to Hatch's bill Thursday, clearing its way for consideration by the full Senate. But Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said he plans to try to attach language to a bill that would require tougher sentences, provide federal assistance and offer grants to prosecute hate crimes - those motivated by hatred for a race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. The White ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kelsey Briggs

**This post was predated and has begun to move on the front page, and although I can not move it because it will effect the links to this story, there is a catagory dedicated to Kelsey's case which will take you to all the posts on her on this site. You will find it HERE. Please continue to check it for updates to this tragic story. Complete news coverage on the case can be found HERE Thank you, L. I wanted to share with everyone the great news that our efforts to continue to bring this story attention has been highlighted on the news in OK. You can find the video from the news cast here: Blog Spot: Meeker girl's death sparks outrage **UPDATES BELOW To those wanting to follow this story, my first post on it and links to all the other posts can be found here , or at the bottom of the post. Full news coverage can be found here. This afternoon I heard from a member of Kelsey's family. For all the grieving they must be doing at this moment, they have the right to receive inf...
36 comments
Read more

Boyfriends...

I sometimes wonder if certain men have some sort of animal DNA breed into them. The type of DNA or whatever it is that makes animals ritually preform certain actions. Like lions, when a male lion takes over a pride it'll often kill the offspring of the previous male, before mating with the female lions and creating cubs of it's own. I only wonder this, because it seems like there are an overwhelming number of men out there that end up killing the children of their girlfriends, not all of them do- but on a case by case comparison between girlfriends killing their boyfriends offspring and boyfriends doing it, it just seems that it's a lot more common amoung men. NOT THAT ALL OF THEM DO THIS... there are some great boyfriends/stepfathers out there that actually take care of kids as if they are their own... but then we have cases like Christopher Thunborg and Kashon Scott. Thunborg was babysitting his girlfriend's 11 month of baby in March when police say he caused ...
Post a Comment
Read more