Skip to main content

Who's Wrong?

A brief summery of the story:

Lori Lynn Letsinger attend the high school concert in which her son was performing. She's the wife of a former board member, although I'm not sure if that really adds anything to the story or not. I'm leaning towards the idea it does.

So, Letsinger wants to attend the concert, which is normal. The only problems is that Letsinger is a convicted sexual offender (pleaded guilty in 2004 to indecent solicitation of a child, prosecutors alleged that Letsinger had sex with a 16-year-old boy).

So she goes to the school board to request permission to attend. The school board agrees that she should be allowed to. They don't contact LE to see if this is appropriate. They don't ask for input from other parents or teachers... in fact they hold a "closed" meeting, denying members of the public the right to be present.

The single problem turns out to be the sole board member who refused to agree to her presense at the concert- Gloria Maloney. She alone felt that parents had the right to be warned... so she handed out fliers alerting them to the danger.

The board issued a censure, an official statement that carries no weight, saying Maloney's failure to respect "the confidentiality of privileged information" violated the board's code of ethics.

"You are talking about a minor child who was traumatized by your actions," board member Patti Lawrence told Maloney at a meeting Monday.

Maloney, whose motion to remove the censure from the board's agenda was defeated, defended her actions, saying that somebody needed to let the public know about the board's decision in closed session to grant a convicted sex offender the right to attend a school function.

"This didn't have anything to do with the child," said Maloney, who voted against the approval. "It had to do with the parent."

So, who do you believe is right in this matter? The board who okayed the presense of a sexual offender without the input of other parents, teachers, or anyone; or the single board member that felt it was her duty to keep the school district informed of what was happening?



Categories: , , ,

Popular posts from this blog

Sen. Kennedy

empirical- ADJECTIVE: Relying on or derived from observation or experiment: empirical results that supported the hypothesis. Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment: empirical laws. Guided by practical experience and not theory, especially in medicine Kennedy hate crimes rider may doom Hatch's sex offender bill By Robert Gehrke The Salt Lake Tribune WASHINGTON - A fight over federal hate crimes legislation could torpedo Sen. Orrin Hatch's push to strengthen the nation's sex-offender registries and clamp down on sex crimes. The Senate Judiciary Committee gave quick, unanimous approval to Hatch's bill Thursday, clearing its way for consideration by the full Senate. But Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said he plans to try to attach language to a bill that would require tougher sentences, provide federal assistance and offer grants to prosecute hate crimes - those motivated by hatred for a race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. The White ...

WTW Someone Please Help Us

There's so much to work with, I'm going to just hit as much as I can. Ashely Simpson decided to pick a fight at McDonald's. Betting millions that if the employee would just go and get the manager- the manager would just love her. Simpson's climbing on the counter and irate behavior where in typical White Trash Style. Great coverage at Stereogum. Tom Cruise has decidedly canned his sister for her inability to help him keep his mouth shut. Evidently he needs a real professional as his PR person- in order to keep him in line. It's just not right firing family because you're and idiot. Kate Hudson is suing someone because of photos of her in which she looks like a starving actress. She claims the images suggest she has a eating disorder- no Kate, it's not the images, it's the you. One should not sue because they have starved themselves to the point of it being noticeable in photos. Please stop by these other great sites to read more WHITE TRASH WEDNESDAY B...

Boyfriends...

I sometimes wonder if certain men have some sort of animal DNA breed into them. The type of DNA or whatever it is that makes animals ritually preform certain actions. Like lions, when a male lion takes over a pride it'll often kill the offspring of the previous male, before mating with the female lions and creating cubs of it's own. I only wonder this, because it seems like there are an overwhelming number of men out there that end up killing the children of their girlfriends, not all of them do- but on a case by case comparison between girlfriends killing their boyfriends offspring and boyfriends doing it, it just seems that it's a lot more common amoung men. NOT THAT ALL OF THEM DO THIS... there are some great boyfriends/stepfathers out there that actually take care of kids as if they are their own... but then we have cases like Christopher Thunborg and Kashon Scott. Thunborg was babysitting his girlfriend's 11 month of baby in March when police say he caused ...