I'm running out of titles for posts. In fact, I would have titled this "the one 
without a title", but I've used that before, elsewhere. So, your stuck with a title that doesn't even begin to describe the level of yuckiness that we're going to be talking about. I will be kind and warn you to keep a bottle of bleach close by... you're really going to want to sanitize your computer (and eyes) after this one.
Today's hot topics at the pedologs have sunk to a new level of low... instead of just their normal "I'm a sick freak who just saw a 7 year old and got a hard on" they opted to take up conversations on incest, and raping babies. Of course, they pretended to only be having a serious conversation about age of consent and incest, and the baby post was worded in a less harsh manner.
It seems it started with new pedolog member littleerules2006, who questioned legalizing incest:
Now, normally that would be enough to wonder what the hell was wrong with this freak, but he doesn't seem able to stop there. After many comments back and forth, he continues with his "I'm not a parent, BUT" lines:
Seriously, if someone is stuck wondering whether they could stop themselves from raping their child.. if they are that clueless about self control- on a topic that most people don't need self control on because they aren't sick freaks... shouldn't we just opt to get this pervert castrated, you know... just in case???
The only thing that makes this worse is the fact that ONE thread about the subject wasn't enough... someone felt the need to start a SECOND thread- questioning the age of consent for incest.
Of course that wasn't all the sickening talk of the day- girlchat member Kratt decided it was important to bring up baby rape... with a less violent sounding rewording- Babies and nonconsensual touching -
Seriously, when someone has to ask where the line is that makes touching a baby TOO SEXUAL... it's time to really begin looking closely at this person. The conversation on that thread quickly goes down hill... and becomes completely unquotable and unlinkable. It was more than I could take, and I was left wanting to reach for the bottle of bleach myself.
without a title", but I've used that before, elsewhere. So, your stuck with a title that doesn't even begin to describe the level of yuckiness that we're going to be talking about. I will be kind and warn you to keep a bottle of bleach close by... you're really going to want to sanitize your computer (and eyes) after this one.Today's hot topics at the pedologs have sunk to a new level of low... instead of just their normal "I'm a sick freak who just saw a 7 year old and got a hard on" they opted to take up conversations on incest, and raping babies. Of course, they pretended to only be having a serious conversation about age of consent and incest, and the baby post was worded in a less harsh manner.
It seems it started with new pedolog member littleerules2006, who questioned legalizing incest:
I'm not sure legalizing incest will ever happen. Thee are really parents who want sexual contact with their children? I don't have any kids myself, so I wouldn't know. But I've been wondering what I would do if I had a daughter and she was in my preferred age group. How many parents do want sexual contact with their children, or allow their children to have relationships with adults? Just curious
Now, normally that would be enough to wonder what the hell was wrong with this freak, but he doesn't seem able to stop there. After many comments back and forth, he continues with his "I'm not a parent, BUT" lines:
I would like to think that if I have a daughter I will do the same. But since I can't go anywhere without looking at girls, I sometimes wonder
Seriously, if someone is stuck wondering whether they could stop themselves from raping their child.. if they are that clueless about self control- on a topic that most people don't need self control on because they aren't sick freaks... shouldn't we just opt to get this pervert castrated, you know... just in case???
The only thing that makes this worse is the fact that ONE thread about the subject wasn't enough... someone felt the need to start a SECOND thread- questioning the age of consent for incest.
Of course that wasn't all the sickening talk of the day- girlchat member Kratt decided it was important to bring up baby rape... with a less violent sounding rewording- Babies and nonconsensual touching -
So... just how would you define "molesting" a baby?
Babies obviously need to be picked up, carried and hugged even when distressed and screaming. And you also have to change napkins and clean their privy parts, even when the baby is distressed and crying - commonly because the privies are in need of cleaning to begin with.
Where would you draw a line where touching a baby is too "sexual"? Assuming it is nothing violent or hurting, of course.
Seriously, when someone has to ask where the line is that makes touching a baby TOO SEXUAL... it's time to really begin looking closely at this person. The conversation on that thread quickly goes down hill... and becomes completely unquotable and unlinkable. It was more than I could take, and I was left wanting to reach for the bottle of bleach myself.
Comments